Monday, June 30, 2025

Agentforce London: Salesforce Reports 78% of UK Companies Embrace Agentic AI

WhatsApp Aims to Collaborate with Apple on Legal Challenge Against Home Office Encryption Directives

AI and the Creative Industries: A Misguided Decision by the UK Government

CityFibre Expands Business Ethernet Access Threefold

Fusion and AI: The Role of Private Sector Technology in Advancing ITER

Strengthening Retail: Strategies for UK Brands to Combat Cyber Breaches

Apple Encryption Debate: Should Law Enforcement Use Technical Capability Notices?

Sweden Receives Assistance in Strengthening Its Sovereign AI Capabilities

MPs to Explore Possibility of Government Digital Identity Program

Former detective claims lawyers and journalists seeking revenge over police phone surveillance

A former detective considered crucial to a probe into allegations of police monitoring of journalists’ phones accused lawyers of seeking revenge, the court heard. Darren Ellis, a former Durham police detective, claimed in an email to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal that lawyers and journalists were disregarding those who challenged them. The tribunal is investigating claims that journalists Trevor Birney, Barry McCaffrey, and Vincent Kearney were unlawfully put under police surveillance to uncover their sources. Ellis, a key witness, stated in an email that he was no longer willing to testify due to the lawyers’ unwillingness to accept explanations. The journalists were unlawfully arrested after producing a documentary exposing police collusion in a murder case. Ellis criticized the journalists’ legal teams for allegedly rewriting history and intimidating challengers. The court was warned about the dangerous language used by Ellis accusing journalists and lawyers of seeking payback. Ben Jaffey, representing the journalists, argued that Ellis should be compelled to give evidence to the tribunal. The case raises concerns about the impact of state surveillance on journalists’ ability to do their job and the safety of their sources. The court declined to combine a complaint from BBC journalist Vincent Kearney with the ongoing hearing, and the case will continue in October.