Friday, January 2, 2026

Keep Your Ubuntu-based VPN Server Up to Date

Enterprise-Grade Security for Small Businesses with Linux and Open Source

Ethics for Ephemeral Signals – A Manifesto

When Regex Falls Short – Auditing Discord Bots with AI Reasoning Models

Cisco Live 2025: Bridging the Gap in the Digital Workplace to Achieve ‘Distance Zero’

Agentforce London: Salesforce Reports 78% of UK Companies Embrace Agentic AI

WhatsApp Aims to Collaborate with Apple on Legal Challenge Against Home Office Encryption Directives

AI and the Creative Industries: A Misguided Decision by the UK Government

CityFibre Expands Business Ethernet Access Threefold

Government worker referred to subpostmasters’ legal threats as mere posturing

In 2015, subpostmasters announced their intentions to sue the Post Office for losses they were blamed for in their branches, which a senior civil servant on the Post Office board dismissed as “sabre-rattling.” Despite previous investigations clearing the Post Office of any wrongdoing, the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance (JFSA) moved forward with litigation against the Post Office, claiming errors in the Horizon computer system were responsible for the accounting shortfalls. However, the former subpostmasters eventually proved in court that the Horizon system was indeed flawed, leading to the overturning of hundreds of wrongful convictions. The public inquiry also revealed shortcomings in the civil service’s handling of the scandal, with one civil servant’s dismissal of the subpostmasters’ claims highlighted as an example of bureaucratic failure. The Post Office scandal, first brought to light by Computer Weekly in 2009, is considered one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in British history.