Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Firewall Challenge Week 3 – DEV Community

Keep Your Ubuntu-based VPN Server Up to Date

Enterprise-Grade Security for Small Businesses with Linux and Open Source

Ethics for Ephemeral Signals – A Manifesto

When Regex Falls Short – Auditing Discord Bots with AI Reasoning Models

Cisco Live 2025: Bridging the Gap in the Digital Workplace to Achieve ‘Distance Zero’

Agentforce London: Salesforce Reports 78% of UK Companies Embrace Agentic AI

WhatsApp Aims to Collaborate with Apple on Legal Challenge Against Home Office Encryption Directives

AI and the Creative Industries: A Misguided Decision by the UK Government

Met Police Probing Senior Post Office Employee for Alleged Evidence Destruction

The Metropolitan Police has stepped in to investigate claims that a Post Office employee told staff to destroy or hide evidence related to the ongoing public inquiry into the Post Office scandal. This comes after new testimony shed light on the situation.

Rachel Scarrabelotti, the current company secretary for the Post Office, stated in her witness statement that a senior staff member allegedly instructed their team to conceal materials that could be important for the inquiry. She also mentioned inappropriate behavior from that same individual. Up until now, there hasn’t been much commentary from either the Met or the Post Office regarding whether this has turned into a police investigation.

However, during a recent inquiry hearing, John Bartlett, who oversees assurance and complex investigations at the Post Office, confirmed that the Metropolitan Police is indeed investigating the matter. He stated, “We told the inquiry about it, we told the Met Police about it, and it is now a Met Police investigation.” He noted that the individual involved, currently suspended, is not participating in the ongoing phase of the inquiry.

This revelation resonates with findings from wrongful conviction appeals in 2021. Back then, it emerged that a senior Post Office executive had urged staff to shred documents that contradicted the claim that the Horizon computer system was reliable, amid allegations that the system had caused unexplained financial discrepancies. During those appeals, lawyers mentioned advice given in 2013 by Simon Clarke, a barrister who worked with the Post Office. He recounted in a note that after a meeting aimed at gathering information on Horizon-related issues, an instruction was issued to destroy the minutes of that meeting—specifically mentioning that the documents should be “shredded.”

Ian Ross, a former police officer and forensic expert, has criticized the lack of police action regarding the scandal. He remarked that in some cases, officials should have already charged individuals with serious offenses.

The Post Office scandal first came to light in 2009, when Computer Weekly reported on the experiences of seven subpostmasters affected by the Horizon software, which has since been recognized as the largest miscarriage of justice in British history.